Teren v. Howard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
This is a stockholder’s derivative suit in which the plaintiff stockholders (appellees) sued on behalf of the Columbia River Paper Company, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter termed “Columbia” and received judgment against certain directors of Columbia.
The major question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the findings of the trial court. If this question is answered in the affirmative, numerous subsidiary questions arise. These are, inter alia:(1) Is relief barred in whole or in part by a statute of limitations or by laches ?(2)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Kelly v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Gottlieb v. McKeeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- Gottlieb v. McKeeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vest v. First National Bank of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. TalbotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. John Babbs, and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Lawson v. Baltimore Paint and Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2321, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9461, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,545, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23930u Joseph Rosenbaum, M.D., Inc., Defined Benefit Pension Plan Joseph Rosenbaum, as Administrator and Trustee of the Joseph Rosenbaum, M.D., Inc., Defined Benefit Pension Plan v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.