Legal Opinion

Hagedorn v. . Hagedorn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

In the companion case of Hagedorn v. Hagedorn, 210 N. C., 164, 185 S. E., 768, the plaintiff sought to reach certain property which, it was alleged, her husband bad placed in corporate holding to defeat her marital rights. Here a similar effort is made to reach property, title to which plaintiff alleges her husband has placed in Lula Hagedorn with like intent and purpose.

HeymaN Hagedorn’s Appeal.

The only exceptions requiring attention on Heyman Hagedorn’s appeal are those directed to the plaintiff’s testimony in which she undertakes to speak to the subject of adultery, in support of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Stickney v. StickneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. State v. . CraneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. McCoy v. . JusticeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Price v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Hicks v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Pruett v. PruettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Lambeth v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API