State v. Lounsbery
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*660Rosellini, J.
In this prosecution for carnal knowledge and indecent liberties, the defendant was found guilty by the court, which heard the testimony of the victim (who was the defendant’s 5-year-old stepdaughter) but struck that testimony and based its findings on the remaining evidence, which was largely circumstantial. The defendant contends it was insufficient to sustain the findings.
According to the defendant, the evidence other than the testimony of the child (which the court decided to disregard because the child did not understand the nature of an oath) was (1) on two occasions the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Treffry v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- State ex rel. Seattle Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. StudebakerWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. BauersWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Blalock v. CondonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BoastWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Washington State School Directors Ass'n v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. NeslundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- State v. BouchardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.