Legal Opinion
Culligan v. Alpern
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1910No. Docket No. 55PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Error to Alpena; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by Patrick Culligan against Morris Alpern upon a promissory note. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The questions involved in this proceeding are so clearly stated by the trial judge in his direction to the jury that we quote therefrom as follows:
“ The action is one brought by Patrick Culligan against Morris Alpern. For a number of years prior to April 10, 1902, Casper Alpern and his stepson, Morris Alpern, had been associated as copartners in the fish business here in this city under the firm name of Alpern & Co. On that day they dissolved that copartnership, and the copartnership relations never thereafter existed between them. That dissolution was evidenced by a written contract which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Solomon v. KirkwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Hall v. HeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Johnson v. EmerickMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Manning v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by15 opinions
- Arnold v. KrugMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Anfenson v. BanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Kane v. Detroit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Germain v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Kyselka v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.