Johnson v. Emerick
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
In 1880 and subsequently tlie plaintiffs were partners, engaged in the business of wholesale grocers at the city of Detroit under the firm name of Johnson & Wheeler.
In August, 1880, William G. Emerick and Winfield S. Gerrish entered into copartnership, under the firm name of W. G. Emerick & Co., to carry on a general mercantile business at the village of Far well, Clare county, Michigan. This firm dealt with the firm of Johnson & Wheeler down to the time of the dissolution of the firm of W. G. Emerick & Co., which occurred on October 15, 1881.
In September, 1880, Gerrish ánd Emerick entered…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. SheldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by6 opinions
- Culligan v. AlpernMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Potter v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Mearns v. ChatardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1918
- National Cash-Register Co. v. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 1897
- Schwier v. HurlburtMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.