Kyselka v. Northern Assurance Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Assumpsit by Albert G. Kyselka against the Northern Assurance Company of Michigan for breach of an agency contract. Judgment for plaintiff on a direeted verdict. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
On the 6th day of April, 1910, plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant company by the terms of which he became its general agent in the State of Michigan, without exclusive territory, with power to appoint agents to work for himself in behalf of said company and to procure applications for insurance in accordance with the rules of said company. Attached to said contract there was a schedule of commissions on first year premiums. It was also provided in said contract that said first party should receive 7% per cent, upon all renewal premiums except business reinstated by company…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Germain v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Culligan v. AlpernMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Conrad Seipp Brewing Co. v. McKittrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arnold v. KrugMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Kane v. Detroit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- City National Bank v. Price's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Long v. DudewiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Mills v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.