Wilson v. Hogsten
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Submitted for Possible Dismissal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from the District Court’s dismissal of Jason Wilson’s complaint. For the following reasons, we will summarily affirm. See Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6.
In January 2006, Appellant, a federal prisoner incarcerated in Pennsylvania, initiated a pro se Bivens action against various prison authorities at the Federal Correctional Institute in Allenwood (FCIAllenwood). 1 Appellant’s amended complaint contended that defendants violated his First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by placing him in the prison’s Special Housing Unit (SHU)…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Frederick T. Ray v. C.O. Kertes C.O. Stolz C.O. Reed C.O. Rogers Lt. Nash Lt. Hicks Lt. A. Smith Capt. Almanshifer R. Norris Tim Launtz, Frederick RayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Young v. QuinlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Griffin v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Davis v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Horst v. LitzDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- ISLAAM v. KUBICKIDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- ISLAAM v. KUBICKIDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Jordan v. BarvesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.