Legal Opinion
Zepczyk v. Nelson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.
The order of the trial court denying the motion for summary judgment must be affirmed.
This court has frequently stated that summary judgment should not be granted where there are substantial issues of fact to be determined, when evidence on a material issue is in conflict, or when there are permissible inferences from undisputed facts that would permit a different result. Thompson v. Dairyland Mut. Ins. Co. (1966), 30 Wis. (2d) 187, 140 N. W. (2d) 200; Hein v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. (1966), 29 Wis. (2d) 702, 139 N. W. (2d) 611; State v. Conway (1965), 26 Wis. (2d) 410, 132 N. W.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Pavelski v. RoginskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Thompson v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Bade v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United Security Insurance v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rauch v. American Family InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Heezen v. Hartland Cicero Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Leo Bernstein v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Roy Austin Stephens v. Roy Austin Stephens, Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Bernstein v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.