Legal Opinion · Dissent

Buhl v. Joint Independent Consolidated School District No. 11

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1957No. 37,059Published

1DissentDell, Chief Justice

I dissent. I regard this case as one of first impression here. The case of Hamilton v. Village of Detroit, 83 Minn. 119, 85 N. W. 933, relied upon in the majority opinion, to me seems clearly distinguishable. There this court held that a proposition submitted to the voters- for the establishment of an electric-light plant and the payment therefor by the issuance of bonds was not invalid as embodying two distinct propositions. In the instant case we have (1) acquisition of school houses, (2) betterment of schoolhouses and the payment for both projects by the issuance of bonds.

The general test…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Village of DetroitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Blaine v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hart v. Board of Education of Nevada School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  4. Board of Education v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Parks v. School District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API