Blaine v. Hamilton
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered May 3, 1911, in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to enjoin a county from issuing bonds.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
This is an action to enjoin King county and its officers from issuing its negotiable'bonds for $1,750,000, as authorized by the qualified voters of the county at an election held for that purpose on November 8, 1910. From a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiffs have appealed.
The bonds were authorized in pursuance, of a resolution of the board- of commissioners of King county, submitting to the qualified voters of the.county the question of issuing its bonds in the amount stated, the proceeds thereof to be expended for the following purposes and in the following amounts:
“(1) $750,000 for…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Coleman v. Town of EutawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Stern v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Lewis v. Commissioners of Bourbon Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Garrigus v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Jones v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Langdon v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. Permanente Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Bentley v. Building Our FutureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.