Legal Opinion

Blizzard Energy v. Schaefers

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 2022No. B314740Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 11/29/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX BLIZZARD ENERGY, INC., 2d Civil No. B314740 (Super. Ct. No. 17CVP-0266) Plaintiff and Appellant, (San Luis Obispo County) v. BERND SCHAEFERS, Defendant and Respondent. We hold that, for purposes of the vexatious litigant statute, a defendant who files a cross-complaint has commenced a separate, distinct, and independent cause of action. Thus, respondent’s cross-complaint in a Kansas action counts as one of the “five litigations” required for a vexatious litigant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Brosterhous v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Skaff v. Small Claims CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Luckett v. PanosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API