Davis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, Circuit Judge;
This is a writ of error to a judgment of conviction for viola^ tions of sections 3258, 3257, 3281, 3282, Revised Statutes (USCA tit. 26, §§ 281, 261, 306, 307 [Comp. St. §§ 5966, 5993, 5994, 6021, 6022]), relating to internal revenue.
Davis, plaintiff in error, was indicted with three others, Harry Rieehmann, Thomas Lewis, and George Meyer. The indictment contained four counts. The first, which may be taken as typical, was as follows:
“That on or about the 22d day of November, A. D. 1922, in the county of St. Lords, in the state of Missouri, within the division and district…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Jarl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Partson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Lynch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Salerno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Swafford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Scheff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Coyle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Flowers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.