Flowers v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Flowers was convicted and sentenced upon an information containing two counts charging violations of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) and has appealed.
Counsel for Flowers contend that counts one and two of the information were insufficient to support the verdict and judgment in that they are vague and uncertain, and do not identify and ear-mark the particular offenses charged with sufficient particularity. Count one charges that Flowers, on March 23,1928, at the New State Hotel, in Shawnee, Pottawatomie county, in the Western district of Oklahoma, did unlawfully…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tingley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Caldwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Skelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metzler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Hood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930