Legal Opinion

Hultquist v. Morrow

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 2005No. COA04-561PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Steven Hultquist and Debra Hultquist (collectively, “plaintiffs”) appeal the entry of summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action construing a restrictive covenant. For the reasons discussed herein, we affirm the trial court order.

The facts and procedural history pertinent to the instant appeal are as follows: In 1998, plaintiffs became interested in purchasing a lot located in the Willowbend Plantation Subdivision (“Willowbend”) in Chatham County. Due to the quality of the soil of the lots in Willowbend, above-ground septic disposal systems were required for each…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Runyon v. PaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ShafferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCrann v. Pinehurst, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Winding Ridge Homeowners Ass'n v. JoffeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. McVicker v. Bogue Sound Yacht Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Danaher v. JoffeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Parker v. Figure "8" Beach Homeowners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API