Legal Opinion
Hamlin v. Harbaugh Enterprises, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 7, 2001No. 3 — 01—0408PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin
Plaintiff Barry Hamlin filed this action against defendants Harbaugh Enterprises, Inc., Pamela Harbaugh and Charles Cain (collectively Harbaugh) to recover damages he allegedly suffered after Pam terminated his employment with Harbaugh. Count I of Barry’s complaint was a petition brought pursuant to section 12.56(a) of the Business Corporation Act of 1983 (Act) (805 ILCS 5/12.56(a) (West 2000)), which provides remedies for nonpublic corporate shareholders.
The court determined that an “election” to purchase Barry’s shares, filed by Harbaugh pursuant to section 12.56(f) of the Act, was timely…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Lawrence M.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Ransom v. A.B. Dick Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. GuerineIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Witters v. HicksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Lohr v. HavensAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Midkiff v. GingrichAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Advanced Imaging Center of Northern Illinois Limited Partnership v. CassidyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.