Legal Opinion

Midkiff v. Gingrich

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 17, 2005No. 5-03-0059PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chapman

The plaintiffs, Dr. Marlene Freeman and Dr. Christina Midkiff, filed a complaint against the defendants, Dr. Tina Gingrich and Tina M.F. Gingrich, M.D., P.C., seeking, among other things, nonpublic shareholder relief pursuant to section 12.56 of the Business Corporation Act of 1983 (Act) (805 ILCS 5/12.56 (West 2002)). Dr. Gingrich filed a notice of election to purchase the plaintiffs’ shares (see 805 ILCS 5/12.56(f) (West 2002)). The trial court granted the plaintiffs’ motion to strike Dr. Gingrich’s notice of election, finding that it was defective because it stated the amount at which she…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Paris v. FederIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Burger v. Lutheran General HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hyatt Corp. v. SweetAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Dynaweld, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. County of Kankakee v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Holtz v. WaggonerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Concerned Citizens & Property Owners v. Illinois Commerce Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  4. County of Kankakee v. Illinois Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. County of Kankakee v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API