Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Powelson

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 5, 1923No. 60PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMayer, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Plaintiff’s Case. The “Outline of Understanding” (hereinafter called the “Outline”) must be construed as a joint venture agreement. It was entered into by both parties in good faith. It is true that defendant’s estimate of the money necessary for the development of the enterprise *302turned out to be too optimistic, but there is no doubt that the preliminary negotiations which led up to the signing of the “Outline” were fairly and honestly conducted by both sides, and, as the District Judge properly held, the “Outline” was entered into without fraud or mistake.

T…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Zimmerman v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Arnold v. . ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Freer v. . DentonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. American Mills Co. v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. DuncanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Notch View Associates v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Kuhlman v. W. & A. FLETCHER CO.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  5. Stryker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API