Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. Reeves
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER H. SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is an original proceeding in this court for a writ of mandamus or prohibition to require the judges of the United States District Court below to try a ease in that court to a jury at law. Counsel for the petitioner, the Henderson Tire & Rubber Company, a corporation, state in their brief that their ground for the issue of the writ is that the judges have improperly transferred an action at law to the equity docket, and are about to proceed to its trial as an equity case, in violation of the petitioner’s constitutional right to a trial thereof by a jury at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Ex Parte SimonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Hydraulic Press Mfg. Co. v. Moore, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Carr v. Donohoe, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Otoe County Nat. Bank v. DelanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.