Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. One 2001 Toyota Camry
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 8, 2006PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIB NER.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County that denied the Commonwealth’s petition to forfeit a 2001 Toyota Camry (Vehicle) owned by Joel Sandler (Sandler). The Commonwealth contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the Vehicle is not derivative contraband subject to forfeiture, as it was used to commit the crime of solicitation of murder, and that the trial court abused its discretion in. concluding that forfeiture would be unreasonable due to the tenuous nexus between the Vehicle and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Real Property & Improvements Commonly Known as 5444 Spruce StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In re MagliscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. 502-504 Gordon StreetCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. FassnachtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. CrosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Johnson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Beaston v. EbersoleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. DurhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. 1997 Chevrolet & Contents Seized From YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth, Aplt v. Irland, J (Semi-Auto Pistol)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.