Commonwealth v. 1997 Chevrolet & Contents Seized From Young
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUSTICE TODD
The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees citizens protection against the government by limiting its power to punish. In this appeal by allowance, we consider, inter alia, the constitutional limitations on civil in rem forfeiture in Pennsylvania under the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment, 1 where the government attempts to seize through forfeiture a home and vehicle not based on any criminal conduct by the property owner—here, a 71-year-old grandmother—but upon the illegal conduct of a third party—her adult son. In doing so, we attempt…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Shoul v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth, Aplt v. Irland, J (Semi-Auto Pistol)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- People ex rel. Hartrich v. 2010 Harley-DavidsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
- Com. v. $301,360.00 U.S. Currency and One 2011 Lexus RX350, VIN 2T2BK1BA48C081250 Appeal of: C. VasquezCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.