Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Durham

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 2010No. 422 WDA 2010PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

Appellant, George M. Durham, appeals from the order denying his pro se motion for return of property. 1 We affirm.

A previous panel of the Superior Court stated the underlying facts of this case as follows:

The Commonwealth arrested Appellant and charged him with the murder of his then girlfriend, Mary Ann Brown. Following trial, on March 14, 2008, a jury found Appellant guilty of first degree murder, and the trial court, on April 23, 2008, sentenced Appellant to a term of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

Appellant’s counsel filed a post-sentence motion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re MagliscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Beaston v. EbersoleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. In re One 1988 Toyota CorollaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Singleton v. JohnsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Eugene Frein v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  2. Commonwealth v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Caviness, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. In Re: Smith, A., Appeal of: Smith, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Caviness, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API