Legal Opinion

Black v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 16, 1953No. 17024PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

The parties hereto appear in this court in the same order as in the trial court, and we will hereinafter refer to them as plaintiffs and defendants.

Plaintiffs sought an injunction against alleged interference, by defendants, with water rights which they claimed to own, together with damages alleged to have been sustained by them as a result of that asserted unlawful interference. The issues were tried to the court; judgment was entered in favor of defendants; and plaintiffs, seeking a reversal of that judgment, bring the cause here by writ of error.

The parties agree that there is no dispute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Safranek v. Town of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. Dehaas v. BeneschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. Montrose Canal Co. v. Loutsenhizer Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Town of Sterling v. Pawnee Ditch Extension Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Three Bells Ranch Associates v. Cache La Poudre Water Users Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Templeton v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Shelton Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. Metropolitan Suburban Water Users Ass'n v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Shirola v. Turkey Cañon Ranch Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API