Southwire Co. v. Essex Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PRENTICE H. MARSHALL, District Judge.
This case presents a question of considerable practical importance to litigants in patent infringement actions. Defendant Essex Group, Inc. (“Essex”) has filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that plaintiff Southwire Company (“Southwire”) is es-topped from enforcing its patent because of Essex’ detrimental reliance on Southwire’s non-action. Plaintiff urges that by making this argument, Essex has waived the attorney-client privilege as to any documents that tend to show that Essex relied not on plaintiff’s failure to act but…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- Billy K. Watkins v. Northwestern Ohio Tractor Pullers Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beneficial Franchise Co. v. Bank One, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Henderson v. Zurn Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
- Dawson v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- THK America, Inc. v. NSK, LTD.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- THK America, Inc. v. NSK Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.