Legal Opinion
United States v. Haulman
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 25, 1968No. 43196PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND OR- • DER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
KEITH, District Judge.
The defendants, Harry L. Haulman and Harry W. Bevan, by their attorneys, James F. Finn and Victor G. Hanson, moved on March 15, 1968, to dismiss the indictment in the above captioned case because they claim generally that the defendants have been denied their constitutional rights to a speedy trial; that the Government has failed to comply with Rule 48(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and that they have *776not been afforded due process under the Fifth Amendment.
On January 21,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Sterling H. Nickens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- United States v. DallagoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
- United States v. Cecil R. Mays, Robert Jack Coltrane, Buddy Herman Mathis, Defendants- United States of America v. Robert Jack Coltrane, Cecil R. Mays, J. Robert WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977