Legal Opinion
United States v. Cecil R. Mays, Robert Jack Coltrane, Buddy Herman Mathis, Defendants- United States of America v. Robert Jack Coltrane, Cecil R. Mays, J. Robert West
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1977No. 75-3083PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
549 F.2d 670
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Cecil R. MAYS, Robert Jack Coltrane, Buddy Herman Mathis,
Defendants- Appellees.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert Jack COLTRANE, Cecil R. Mays, J. Robert West,
Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 75-3083, 75-3084.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
March 3, 1977.
Stephen V. Wilson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for the government.
Stephen D. Miller, Beverly Hills, Cal., for Mays.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Before BARNES, ELY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
OPIN…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States of America, and v. Ronald Holm, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- John Alcantara v. Leland McEwenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015