Legal Opinion

Egan v. Wege

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

We recite here and in the foregoing only such facts as we consider necessary to a determination of the issues presented. We omit reference to testimony bearing upon the condition of the weather and the road and that which concerns the question whether vision through the windows of the Wege car was or was not obscured by mist. It does not appear that these circumstances affected Wege’s conduct, or that they had any direct or indirect connection with the collision.

There is ample testimony to support the jury’s findings that defendant was causally negligent in operating upon his left side of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Knipfer v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Harter v. DickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wolfe v. Iowa Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. Marchant v. FranzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. DerfusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holtz v. FogartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Topel v. CorrezWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Stotzheim v. DjosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Werner Transp. Co. v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  5. Muehlenbeck v. FitchettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API