Legal Opinion

Harrison v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided November 30, 2005No. 09-05-025 CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.

This is an appeal of a court order compelling continued inpatient mental health treatment under article 46.03 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 46.03. 1 In Millet Harrison’s last appeal, this Court held the record of the last hearing did not support the trial court’s finding of the inappropriateness of outpatient treatment. See Harrison v. State, 148 S.W.3d 678, 689 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 2004, no pet.). On remand, the trial court held a new hearing and admitted testimony from a court-appointed expert, who concluded continued…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Salinas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Laney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
  2. Harrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
  3. Harrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
  4. Andrew Sawyer Weller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2015
  5. Deanna Laney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API