Legal Opinion

Gates v. Gates

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 8, 2008No. File CV-08-4009454-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyma, J.

The issue to be determined is whether the plaintiff timely appealed from an adverse decision of the Probate Court for the district of Milford. The defendants, Esla Eugene Gates and Wayne Gates, move to dismiss the action, claiming that the plaintiff, Richard Gates, failed to commence the action properly by filing his complaint with the Superior Court within thirty days of the mailing of the memorandum of decision of the Probate Court as required by General Statutes § 45a-186, as amended by Public Acts 2007, No. 07-116, § 2 (P.A. 07-116). The plaintiff opposes the motion, asserting, generally,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. American Masons' Supply Co. v. F. W. Brown Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Slattery v. WoodinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  5. Filippi v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Connery v. GieskeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. Gates v. GatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API