Legal Opinion

County Council v. Carl M. Freeman Associates Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 19, 1977No. [No. 9, September Term, 1977.]PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

This action, involving a comprehensive zoning amendment by petitioner County Council for Prince George’s County, presents two essentially procedural issues for our consideration. On the one hand, the Council contends that this suit is not properly before us because respondent Carl M. Freeman Associates, Inc., instituted it by way of administrative appeal when no such remedy is provided by law. On the other hand, the respondent asserts that the map amendment is invalid as a matter of law because it was approved by resolution instead of by ordinance. Although we reject the petitioner’s…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Eastgate Associates v. ApperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Poe v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Unnamed Physician v. Commission on Medical DisciplineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Boyds Civic Ass'n v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. O'DONNELL v. BasslerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Prince George's County v. SilvermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. South Easton Neighborhood Ass'n, Inc. v. Town of EastonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API