Legal Opinion

Sandberg v. Murphy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1925No. 19285. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In this suit to set aside a tax deed issued on a county foreclosure for general taxes, trial was had upon a written stipulation of the facts. At the time of the tax foreclosure, respondent John Sand- berg was a mortgagee. The record owner at the time was James McCormick. At the tax foreclosure sale .the property was bid in by Isaac Lemaster, who subsequently deeded it to this appellant. At the time of the tax foreclosure, respondents had commenced foreclosure of their mortgage, but, judgment had not been entered nor sale made. After the issuance of the tax deed, respondents went ahead with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Singly v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McManus v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Great Western Railway Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. City of Everett v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Diamond v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Call v. JeremiahOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Clallam County v. FolkWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Title and Trust Co. v. Columbia Basin Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In Re Foreclosure of LiensWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Call v. JeremiahOregon Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API