Legal Opinion
United States v. Saneaux
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 1, 2005No. S203CR.781(CSH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge.
Count One of the captioned indictment against defendants Samuel Saneaux and Rafael Estrella charges them with participating in a single conspiracy to solicit and accept bribes from prospective tenants to advance those individuals on the waiting list for a federally funded apartment complex in the Bronx. Trial is scheduled to begin on April 25, 2005.
Defendants have filed motions in limine to preclude anticipated government evidence. The government resists those motions. A core dispute relates to the admissibility of certain out-of-court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne WhitmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Dennis Geaney and Vincent Russell LynchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Michael Tracy and Francisco Luis AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Park West Radiology v. Carecore National LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. SaneauxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- United States v. SaneauxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005