United States v. Saneaux
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the in limine motions of defendants Samuel Sa-neaux and Rafael Estrella to preclude certain evidence expected to be offered by the government at trial. Defendants argue that transcripts of recordings of an unin-dicted coconspirator who is unavailable to testify constitute hearsay evidence and do not fall within the hearsay exemption for statements of coconspirators contained in Rule 801(d)(2)(E) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. In an opinion dated April 4, 2005, 1 I required the parties to address what…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. AlabiDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- United States v. LoeraDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- United States v. AbakporoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. RamosDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- United States v. SaneauxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.