Legal Opinion

United States v. Saneaux

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 18, 2005No. S203CR.781(CSH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HAIGHT, Senior District Judge.

A second superseding indictment charged defendants Samuel Saneaux and Rafael Estrella with conspiring to accept bribes in order to secure individuals an apartment in Andrews Plaza, a federally subsidized housing project located in the Bronx. In addition to the conspiracy charge, both defendants were charged with several related substantive offenses. Following trial the jury convicted Saneaux on the conspiracy charge but was unable to reach a verdict on the substantive charges against him and on any of the charges against Estrella. The Court declared a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. William RaglandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. Enrique Reinaldo Rivera and Samuel Aponte-VegaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MBIA Ins. Corp. v. Royal Bank of CanadaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API