Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Owen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1956No. 400PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is a suit to enforce specific performance of a written memorandum allegedly given for the sale of a house and lot. The burden was on the plaintiff to show that the memorandum was executed in compliance with the Statute of Frauds.

The written memorandum does not even indicate the name of a vendee. The courts have held with great uniformity that the substantive parts of the contract or memorandum for the sale of property, to be sufficient to satisfy the Statute of Frauds, must appear in the writing; therefore, the name, or a sufficient description of the party seeking enforcement of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grafton v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Mayer v. . AdrianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Hall v. Misenheimer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Smith v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Oglesby Grocery Co. v. Williams Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brooks v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Lewis v. AllredSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Carr v. Good Shepherd Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Brooks v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API