Legal Opinion

The Governor Warfield

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 28, 1930No. Nos. 10155, 10980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The two above-entitled suits on stipulation were tried together, the United States of America having been impleaded in the first above-entitled suit, on the petition of Standard Transportation Company, claimant of motor vessel Soeony No. 5.

On evidence which is somewhat conflicting, I find as follows:

The Governor Warfield, a dredge owned by the libelant Arundel Corporation, 120 feet long and 42 feet wide, was engaged in a dredging operation on the Middle Reef area, Hell Gate, East River, New York, under contract with the United Státes government, and *927had been engaged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Transfer No. 21Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. United States v. BreenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1889
  3. United States v. MoodyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1908
  4. The NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. The WarrenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Company v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. T. H. Browning Steamship Company, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. F. H. Peavey & Company (A Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API