Legal Opinion

The Warren

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 28, 1930No. 7200PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Two main grounds for recovery are pressed, one that the Warren was shown to be unseaworthy at the time of the charter, the other, that her loss, being unexplained, there arises a presumption that she was unseat worthy. These will be considered in the order stated.

On the 26th day of March, 1927, petitioners chartered the Warren to the Independent Gravel Company of Seattle, Wash., the charter being for one year, she then lying in the waters of Grays Harbor, to be delivered to charterers in the waters of Puget Sound, it being understood…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. The CaledoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. The Edwin I. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. The FolminaSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. The MajesticSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. The Governor WarfieldDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
  3. In re DOYLECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  4. In re ErlandsenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API