Legal Opinion

Marks v. City of Tucumcari

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1979No. 12255PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERIC1, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellees Marks and plaintiffappellee McFarland Brothers Bank (Bank) brought this action against appellant City of Tucumcari (City) seeking a declaration of their rights to certain real estate in Quay County. The trial court entered judgment for Marks and Bank. The City appeals. We affirm.

The stipulated facts are: On April 11, 1974, Marks purchased the property in question from Robert and Rose Mary Golden-stein (judgment debtors) by real estate contract. On May 1, 1976, the contract of sale was recorded in the office of the Quay County Clerk. On September…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Mesich v. Board of County Com'rs of McKinley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n of Las Cruces v. CollinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Warren v. RodgersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Trondson v. JanikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Shaw v. Dawson (In Re Shaw)District Court, D. New Mexico · 1985
  4. Bank of Hawaii v. HorwothHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Cano v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API