Legal Opinion
City of Grandview v. Ingle
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 2, 1936No. 1654PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALEXANDER, Justice.
Certain relief laborers while doing work under the National Industrial Recovery Act (48 Stat. 195) removed a concrete slab from a crosswalk over a ditch in the city of Grandview for the purpose of cleaning the ditch. They failed to replace the slab, and as a result plaintiff fell into the ditch and was injured. Plaintiff sued the city -of Grandview for the personal injuries 'sustained by him and recov ered judgment for the sum of $325. The city appealed.'
The relief work that was being done in Johnson county under the National Industrial Recovery Act was under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Austin v. RitzTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- East Line & Red River R'y Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SheltonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Austin v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Gilligan v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1946
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Steele v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- City of Abilene v. FillmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.