State v. Wildenberg

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

Lyf Christian Wildenberg (‘Wildenberg”) claims his Sixth Amendment constitutional right of confrontation was denied when personal journals of K.A., the victim of an alleged sexual assault, were ruled by the trial court to be irrelevant and therefore nondis-coverable in Wildenberg’s trial for criminal *694sexual conduct pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(g) (1992). The court of appeals agreed with Wildenberg and reversed concluding that the trial court erred in its ruling, and that the error was prejudicial because the trial court allowed the jury to hear a taped…