Jenney v. Gray
Ohio Supreme Court
Error to tbe District Court of Medina county. cited: 1 Bouv. Law Die. 619 ; 8 J. R .151; 9 J. R. 108; 1 O. E. 251; 8 O. R. 294 ; 12 O. R. 88 ; 15 O. R. 248, 252; Hilliard’s Abr. (1st ed.) 53 ; 1 Co. Lit. 630, margin; lb. 639, 642 ; 4 Kent’s Com. Ill, 112 ; Cons., art. IY, sec. 4 ; Swan’s St. 261; Code, sec. 552 ; Oro. Eliz. 33 ; 2 P. Wms. 1771; 1 Roll’s Abr. 728 ; Cro. Car. 515 ; 2 Bla. Com. 113.
1Opinion of the CourtThurman, C. J.
Gray brought a civil action, in the common pleas, against Jenney and others, for entering his close, and cutting and carrying away some wheat — laying his damages at $150. Jenny justified under a cropping agreement made with one Isaac Yan Dorn ; and the other defendants justified under Jenney as his hired men.
In the district court, to which the cause was appealed, it was submitted to the court upon the following agreed statement of facts:
“ It is agreed that the plaintiff is the owner of the land described in his petition ; that he went into possession on the 16th *47day of March, A. D. 1853 ;…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- White v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1849
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yates v. Whyel Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Moses v. St. Louis Sectional Dock Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Hershizer v. FlorenceOhio Supreme Court · 1883
- Logan v. ThriftOhio Supreme Court · 1870
- Machir v. BurroughsOhio Supreme Court · 1863
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.