Legal Opinion
Radack v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 9, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-01881 HHKPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KENNEDY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Jesselyn Radack (“Radack”), brings this action against her former employer, the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”), alleging that DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility (“OPR”) violated the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701, by disclosing information about her to District of Columbia and Maryland Bar officials. Before the court is DOJ’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, as to Radack’s Privacy Act claim [# 4]. Upon…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Central Platte Natural Resources District v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Doe v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Dick v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Budik v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.