Mullennex v. Draper
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, c.j.
This is an action on an account stated. The complaint alleges that Boyd & Erwin, attorneys at law, rendered .an account stated in the sum of $600 to defendant, who promised to pay the account but failed to do so. The account was assigned for collection to plaintiff who brought this action. The court tried the case without a jury and found for defendant. Upon appeal plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in finding that she failed to sustain the burden of proving her alleged account stated and in entering judgment for defendant. -
Because in the trial court plaintiff mhde…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Bassett v. BassettOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Larsen v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Carlson v. SteinerOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. West Coast Fast Freight, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Briscoe v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Soott v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State Highway Commission Ex Rel. Pantovich Construction Co. v. BrassfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Thompson & Georgeson, Inc. v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Briscoe v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.