Legal Opinion

Hill v. Richards

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1962No. Appeal, 78PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of nonsuit after the lower Court had dismissed plaintiff’s motion to take off a compulsory nonsuit in an action of trespass for personal injuries.

We have considered the testimony and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. The defendants were the owners of a property in Pen Argyl upon which they were building a home, mostly by the individual labor of the husband-defendant. The plaintiff, who was a neighbor and the janitor for the high school, would watch what Mr. Richards was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCreery v. Westmoreland Farm Bureau Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Brewster v. MorroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Staub v. Toy Factory, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Warren v. StancliffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. Atkins v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH., ETC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. O'Quendo v. Food Fair Stores, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API