Legal Opinion

Staub v. Toy Factory, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 2000PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, J.:

¶ 1 In this negligence/personal injury action, plaintiffs/appellants Paul and Nancy Staub appeal from the order dated November 5, 1997, granting summary judgment to defendants Grimm Industries, Inc., Toy Factory Inc., and Karl Kenyon (“collectively,” the “Grimm defendants” or “Grimm”); and Carrara Steel Erectors, Inc., Carrara Steel, Inc., and Amthor Steel, Inc. (“collectively,” the “Carrara defendants” or “Car-rara”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

¶ 2 The facts of the case are as follows. Appellant Paul Staub (“appellant”) was employed by Barnhart Builders,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Rabutino v. Freedom State Realty Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Bullman v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Valentino v. Philadelphia Triathlon, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Beck-Hummel v. Ski Shawnee, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Thomas v. West Bend Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API