Legal Opinion

H. Lissner Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 20, 1931No. K-471PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

This suit was instituted to recover $150,-000, but in the brief plaintiff claims that if it is entitled to value its inventory at January 1, 1920, at actual market value, it is entitled to judgment for $99,155.76 with interest. In the alternative it is claimed that for the period March 20, 1920, to December 31, 1920, it overpaid its tax in the amount of $76,241.31.

The controversy arises over the fact that although it is claimed that the business was carried on and conducted in all respects as if it had been a corporation on and after January 1, 3920, the corporation charter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Maas & Waldstein Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Hellman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  4. Wausau Sulphate Fibre Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Snead v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  2. Pelham Hall Co. v. CarneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  3. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1934
  4. Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Alabama Department of RevenueCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API