Legal Opinion

Hellman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 20, 1930No. E-199PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

A new trial was allowed in this case. The partnership, Smith & Kaufmann, made a return for 1919 on which plaintiff’s distributive share of the partnership profits for that year was shown as $121,701.25. Plaintiff had withdrawn from the partnership in November, 1919, and had nothing to do with the preparation of this return. Upon receipt of information that the return showed his 1919 distributive share as stated, he objected to it, but the return as prepared was filed, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue held that in, addition to certain other income, consisting of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchel v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Rouss v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Bing v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1927
  4. Morse v. Tillotson & Wolcott Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Beck Chemical Equipment Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  2. Foxman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  3. Moore v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  4. Klein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  5. Schwerin v. CommissionerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API