Legal Opinion

Coleman v. United States

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided January 9, 1934No. 119PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STRUM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs sue at law to recover income taxes alleged to have been wrongfully exacted of them for the calendar year 1917. The cause comes on for final hearing upon the pleadings, and evidence heard by the court.

On April 1, 1918, plaintiffs filed their partnership return of income and profit taxes for the calendar year 1917. An assessment of $1,729.51 was made thereon. Said assessment was reduced by an abatement of $36.01, certificate of which was issued on May 28, 1923, leaving a net tax of $1,693.50 here in question.

Plaintiffs claim to Have paid the original assessment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Aiken v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Red Wing Malting Co. v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API