Joshua J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 Joshua J. (“Father”) appeals the juvenile court’s findings of dependency as to his son, J.J., and his daughter, J.L.J. We hold that the juvenile court erred by not completing the hearing within the time limit prescribed by Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 8-842(C) (Supp.2011).1 We also decide, however, that Father was not prejudiced by the delay and that the evidence supported the court’s findings of dependency. We therefore affirm the dependency determinations.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In A.R.S. § 8-842(C), our Legislature established time limits within which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pleasant Hills Borough v. CarrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- State v. BradyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Department of Revenue v. Southern Union Gas Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Willie G. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Steven Lane Fuller v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Crosby-Garbotz v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Aaron W. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Amanda Campion and James Campion v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
- Angela B. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.