Sensing v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this appeal, Roger Sensing requests that we order the superior court to direct the Phoenix Chief of Police to enforce a city ordinance that generally prohibits solicitation on city streets. The order Sensing seeks, known as a writ of mandamus, is normally issued by a court to require a public officer or entity to perform a nondiscretionary duty imposed by law. Here, because law enforcement decisions are generally discretionary decisions not subject to direction by the judiciary, mandamus relief would be improper. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- McAlister v. CitibankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Collins v. KruckerArizona Supreme Court · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- United States v. Maricopa CountyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- FLAGSTAFF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Design Alliance Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Green v. GarriottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Blankenbaker v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.