United States v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. R.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
On Motion for Directed Verdict.
1Opinion of the Court
McCADL, District Judge.
In this case the United States sues the defendant, the St. Douis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad company, to recover the penalty as provided for violating sections 2 and 4 of the safety appliance act, approved March 2, 1893 (27 Stat. 531, c. 196 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3174]), and as amended April 1, 1896. There are 11 counts in the declaration based upon 11 alleged violations of the law. The defendant pleaded the general issue of not guilty to each count. -The case was heard before the court and a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, the defendant…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- United States v. Illinois Cent. R.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1907
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Hohenleitner v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1910
- United States v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.